J. F. Goubau, L. Goubau, A. Van Tongel, P. Van Hoonacker, D. Kerckhove, B. Berghs (2013).The wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb (WHAT) test: a more specific and sensitive test to diagnose de Quervain tenosynovitis than the Eichhoff’s Test. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Mar; 39(3): 286–292. Published online 2013 Jan 22. doi: 10.1177/1753193412475043
“The WHAT test is performed as follows: the wrist is hyperflexed and the thumb abducted in full MP and IP extension, resisted against the therapist’s index finger. Exacerbation of the symptomatology is considered a positive test result”.
The Skinny- When choosing a provocative test for De Quervain’s disease (De Quervain’s Tenosynovitis Test), therapists in the past have typically chosen from two popular tests; Eichoff’s test and Finkelstein’s test. The latter often being confused with the first. This study compares Eichoff’s test to a new test called The Wrist Hyperflexion and Abduction of the Thumb test (wrist hyperabduction test – WHAT). The study included 100 patients experiencing de Quervain tendinopathy between the years 2007-2010.
In The Weeds-Each patient underwent the Eichoff’s test and the WHAT test in random order by two experienced hand surgeons (test for de quervain’s tenosynovitis). Each provocative testing procedure was carried out in the same sequence to ensure consistency. Patients who tested positive under either test were sent for X-ray and ultrasonography to confirm the diagnosis of de Quervains.
Results: Ninety-three ultrasounds were positive and seven were negative. The accuracy of Eichoff’s test was .84 while the accuracy of the WHAT test was .94, suggesting that the latter performs better overall in establishing the correct diagnosis. The WHAT test also produced a better sensitivity at .99 and specificity at .29.
Bring it Home- A new test known as the WHAT test was developed due to the controversy associated with the accuracy of Eichoff’s test, and also the need for a more patient-friendly test for use in daily practice. This study found the WHAT test to be superior in all categories. This may be due in part to the specific mechanics of the WHAT test, positioning the anatomy in a way to accurately detect even the earliest symptoms.
This study was transparent about their methodology and had well thought out methods including sequence protocols for each provocative test for consistency, random order, and a large sample size. Using ultrasound technology to confirm the results of the in-clinic provocative testing provides a reliable diagnosis for comparison. Detailed explanations of the WHAT test were also provided along with pictures and illustrations of the anatomy, showing the superior mechanism of the test.
2 Comments
Leave a Comment
More To Read
Distal radius fracture types seen in the hand therapy clinic
Distal radius fractures are one of the most common injuries seen in hand therapy. Several different distal radius fracture classification systems have been developed, and this blog post will focus on the more common types of distal radius fractures and their classification. Extra-articular fractures are either nondisplaced or displaced fractures. These fractures occur outside…
Read More
Simple but Effective Ways Hand Therapists Address Psychosocial Impacts of Upper Extremity Injuries
Although psychosocial factors are often not formally assessed during an evaluation in those with upper extremity injuries, the therapist often informally assesses these during and after treatment sessions. Sustaining an upper extremity injury can be a physically and emotionally challenging experience. Beyond the physical pain and limitations, these injuries can profoundly impact an individual’s psychosocial…
Read More
Prevention and Management of Upper Extremity injuries in Modern Mass Production
Injuries and Upper Extremty Pitts, G., Custer, M., Foister, R. D., & Uhl, T. (2021). The hand therapist’s role in the preventionand management of upper extremity injuries in the modern mass production industrial setting.Journal of Hand Therapy, 34(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.04.019 By: Kaylen Kallander The Skinny: This study included four case studies to determine the impact…
Read More
Phantom Limb Pain, Residual Limb Pain, & Phantom Limb Sensation: Which is Which?
Written by Melissa Miller Introduction After amputation, the majority of individuals will experience phantom limb pain (PLP), residual limb pain (RLP), and/or phantom limb sensation (PLS). Experiencing these pains or sensations can greatly disrupt an individual’s quality of life. It is important to know what each of these are as each can impact the client…
Read More
Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!
Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.
I am looking forward to performing this test along with the Eichoff’s test. I think that if both are positive then it provides the physician with more information at their next MD appointment. I find that this diagnosis is often missed with my wrist sprain/strain patients.
Thank you for this information.
Nice post, I really appreciate you for sharing this informative post. Thanks