Comparison of Interventions for Tennis Elbow aka Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

Reference:
Lowdon, H., Chong, H. H., Dhingra, M., Gomaa, A.-R., Teece, L., Booth, S., Watts, A. C., & Singh, H. P. (2024). Comparison of interventions for lateral elbow tendinopathy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis for patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation pain outcome. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 49(7), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.03.007

Brief Overview:
This Level 1 evidence article is a systematic review of treatments for tennis elbow also known as lateral epicondyle tendinopathy across various randomized controlled trials. The research aimed to identify which interventions provided the most benefits compared to any placebos for short-term (up to 6 weeks) and midterm (6 weeks up to 6 months) outcomes. In treating tennis elbow, a variety of interventions are typically used, including activity modification, physiotherapy, orthotics, medical treatments (including injection therapies), and surgery. The researchers of this study aimed to expand the evidence on this subject by comparing interventions to placebos and control groups.

Methods:
The evidence was collected following the Cochrane Handbook standard systematic review protocol. The study included a total of 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Eligible criteria included adult patients aged at least 18 years, interventions (therapy, injection therapy, extracorporeal shockwave therapy [ECSWT], acupuncture/dry needling, and surgical release), control/placebo or other included intervention comparisons, PRTEE pain score, and sufficient data. The outcome measures were the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) pain score, a validated 15-item questionnaire consisting of pain and function specific to lateral epicondyle tendinopathy.

Results and Conclusions:
Therapy and exercise showed improvement in the PRTEE pain score during midterm follow-up. The study showed that dry needling may yield potential short-term benefits, but individual response varied. Two injection therapies, autologous blood and steroid injections, improved PRTEE pain score at midterm follow-up. Orthotics, ECSWT, TENS, and surgery showed no statistically significant benefit according to the PRTEE pain score. Researchers concluded that the results should be interpreted with caution because of the limited amount of evidence that met the criteria. The optimal treatment for lateral epicondyle tendinopathy is still not concrete; however, physiotherapy or exercise is the intervention best supported by evidence.

Rating:
4/5 – This article is a Level 1 therapeutic evidence article, a high ranking of evidence. The authors considered the most common interventions and effectively discussed how the trials used supported their conclusions.

2 Comments

  1. Valerie Kelley on August 19, 2024 at 10:01 am

    Any details on the therapy and exercise used?

    • Miranda Materi on August 24, 2024 at 12:27 pm

      The meta analysis did state specific exercises as it reviewed several articles all with different exercises.

Leave a Comment






More To Read

Use of Orthoses for Tendonitis: Why They Help

July 12, 2026

Tendonitis can make routine activities such as gripping, lifting, typing, texting, or opening containers painful and difficult. In many cases, symptoms develop when a tendon is repeatedly stressed or irritated and does not have enough time to recover. When this happens, continued use of the hand, wrist, or elbow can keep the tendon irritated and…

IFC vs TENS: Electrical Stimulation for Pain and Swelling

December 1, 2019

In this article we’re looking at the difference between Inferential Current versus Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (IFC vs TENS). Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) TENS variations are often described by their technical characteristics: high frequency, low intensity (conventional TENS) or low frequency, high intensity (acupuncture-like TENS, AL-TENS) (Walsh et al., 2009). How TENS Addresses Pain:…

A Better De Quervain’s Tenosynovitis Test

November 10, 2019

J. F. Goubau, L. Goubau, A. Van Tongel, P. Van Hoonacker, D. Kerckhove, B. Berghs (2013).The wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb (WHAT) test: a more specific and sensitive test to diagnose de Quervain tenosynovitis than the Eichhoff’s Test. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Mar; 39(3): 286–292. Published online 2013 Jan 22. doi:…

Which is better: Splinting the MCP or PIP joint when managing Trigger Finger?

June 2, 2019

Teo, S. H., Ng D. C., Wong, Y.K.(2018).  Effectiveness of proximal interphalangeal joint blocking orthosis vs metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis in trigger digit: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Hand Therapy, 1-7. The Skinny- This study compared PIP joint immobilization via an Oval-8TM with a custom MCP blocking trigger finger orthosis treatment.  In the Weeds…

Envelope_1

Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!

Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.