Early Mobilization After Volar Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal Radius Fractures in Older Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

By: Rachel Reed

Sørensen, T. J., Ohrt-Nissen, S., Ardensø, K. V., Laier, G. H., & Mallet, S. K. (2020). Early Mobilization After Volar Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal Radial Fractures in Older Patients-A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of hand surgery, S0363-5023(20)30276-8. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.05.009

The Skinny:

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if early mobilization following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures (DRFs) was more functionally beneficial for adults older than 50 years when compared to late mobilization. The authors hypothesized that patients would report higher positive outcomes with early mobilization; however, they found no significant differences between the two groups in ROM, grip strength, or DASH scores when assessed at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery.

In the Weeds:

This was a single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) that took place over an 11-month period. The participants in this study received a volar locking plate (volar bearing plate) following a DRF (volar locking plate distal radius fracture). After surgery, they were randomly allocated to either the early mobilization (E-MOB) group or to the late mobilization (L-MOB) group. There was a total of 95 patients enrolled in this study; there were 47 patients in the E-MOB group and 48 in the L-MOB group. 

The patients in the E-MOB group were provided with:

  • A removable orthosis and daily exercises
  • Non-weight-bearing exercises of the fingers and wrist from the first postoperative day

Patients in the L-MOB group were provided with: 

  • A dorsal plaster cast for 2 weeks
  • After 2 weeks, a removable orthosis and exercises

The patients were assessed using range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Both groups improved when they were measured at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Additionally, there were no significant differences in DASH scores between the two groups at any point in time (P > .05). 

Bringing it Home:

Because there were no significant differences in assessment measures between the two groups at any point in time, the authors concluded that early mobilization after surgery to treat distal radius fractures does not lead to improved patient-reported outcomes. 


3/5 – This study was interesting to read and had potential to inform practice guidelines. However, there were significant limitations to this study. The fact that the authors of this study defined late mobilization as immobilization lasting for only 2 weeks does not reflect the variation of late mobilization practices that are often put into practice by surgeons and doctors. Two weeks is still relatively early. In addition, the patient’s adherence to their home program was not monitored, which may have skewed data. It is also important to consider that the E-MOB group may not have had early mobilization exercises prescribed that were active enough to have a significant effect on their recovery (volar plate surgery recovery time is being reduced) when compared to the L-MOB group.


  1. Aaron Kubistek,CHT on October 26, 2020 at 5:04 am

    Early Mobilization definitely matters.
    Getting the intrinsics to glide early makes life easier for the patient once they begin formal treatment

    • Miranda Materi on October 26, 2020 at 8:27 pm

      Great point.

  2. Nancy Irwin on October 26, 2020 at 5:52 am

    Agree. I have seen cast put on improperly and there’s no intrinsic movement resulting in a lot of stiffness for the patient. I think it Has to be assessed on an individual basis. I think the bottom line is the patient should be seen by OT immediately to assess what they need to provide a good outcome

    • Miranda Materi on October 26, 2020 at 8:27 pm

      Yes, that is the ideal situation. For various reason this does not always happen!

  3. Janice on October 26, 2020 at 8:23 pm

    What about starting at 4 weeks ? We get patients at 4 weeks often and I feel it’s a long rehab. Hand and wrist are stuff because they are told not to move until seeing a therapist .

    • Miranda Materi on October 26, 2020 at 8:28 pm

      Yes that is very late and does make for a long process.

Leave a Comment

More To Read

Carpal Tunnel Treatment: Splinting Only vs Splinting & Conservative Treatment

January 12, 2020

Short-term clinical outcome of orthosis alone vs combination of orthosis, nerve, and tendon gliding exercises and ultrasound therapy for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Sim, Sze En et al. Journal of Hand Therapy, Volume 32, Issue 4, 411 – 416 The Skinny- Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compression neuropathy. Compression of the…

Read More

Our Favorite Mallet Finger Splints

February 16, 2023

By: Josh MacDonald Fabricating a custom splint for a mallet finger injury is challenging. Fingers are tiny and they have small tolerances for errors and adjustments with custom splints. Making a splint for a mallet finger injury is probably the hardest type of finger splint for a therapist to make.  Treatment recommendations vary, with some…

Read More

What? I just received an order for suture removal…

April 21, 2019

How many of us have practiced suture removal in occupational or physical therapy school??  NOT I!! Often, hand surgeons will ask the therapist to remove sutures and sometimes the order will even say “remove sutures when ready”  SO NOW WHAT? How to remove continuous sutures? First, we can cover the basics of sutures! There are…

Read More

Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!

Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.