Title: Understanding De Quervain’s Pathology: A Comprehensive Exploration of Special Tests
Filed under Evaluation
Understanding De Quervain’s Pathology: A Comprehensive Exploration of Special Tests
By: Miranda Materi
De Quervain’s and Special Tests
De Quervain’s tenosynovitis is a condition characterized by inflammation of the tendons on the thumb side of the wrist, causing pain and discomfort. These tendons include Abductor Pollicis Longus (APL) and Extensor Pollicis Brevis as they pass through the first dorsal compartment. The various special tests play a crucial role in identifying and confirming this pathology. In this blog post, we will cover three specific tests: Finkelstein’s, Eichhoff’s, and the Wrist Hyperflexion and Abduction Test (WHAT). We will also explore their significance in diagnosing De Quervain’s tenosynovitis.

Finkelstein’s Test: Unraveling the Classic Maneuver
Finkelstein’s test is a well-known and widely used diagnostic maneuver for assessing De Quervain’s tenosynovitis. During this test, the patient’s wrist is placed on the edge of a table, and they are asked to actively ulnarly deviate the wrist before the examiner grasps the patient’s thumb, passively flexing it into the palm. A positive finding includes pain along the radial side of the wrist, particularly over the first dorsal compartment, indicating of inflammation in the abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis tendons. (Wu, Rajpura, & Sandher, 2018).

Eichhoff’s Test: Clarifying the Confusion
Eichhoff’s test, often confused with Finkelstein’s, involves a different maneuver. In this test, the participant is instructed to place the thumb within the hand and clench tightly with the other fingers. The examiner can palpate the abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis tendons over the lateral radius, feeling for moving nodularity, tendon rub, or popping directly over the tendon. (Wu, Rajpura, & Sandher, 2018).

Over the years, a misinterpretation has occurred between these two tests, with Eichhoff’s being confused with Finkelstein’s. Hand therapists need to differentiate between these maneuvers for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment.
The WHAT Test: A Novel Approach
To compare Eichhoff’s test with a new diagnostic tool, a prospective study was conducted over three years involving a cohort of 100 patients (88 women, 12 men) experiencing spontaneous pain over the radial side of the styloid of the radius (de Quervain’s tendinopathy). The Wrist Hyperflexion and Abduction of the Thumb (WHAT) test was introduced.
The Wrist Hyperflexion and Abduction of the Thumb (WHAT) test presents several advantages over traditional tests like Eichhoff’s and Finkelstein’s in the diagnosis of De Quervain’s tenosynovitis. The WHAT test combines hyperflexion and abduction of the wrist. This unique combination aims to reproduce symptoms more effectively by stressing the tendons involved in De Quervain’s pathology, providing a broader and potentially more accurate assessment. (Goubau et al., 2014).

Additionally, the WHAT test may offer improved sensitivity and specificity, allowing for a more reliable diagnosis. By incorporating both hyperflexion and abduction, it comprehensively evaluates the involvement of the abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis tendons, enhancing the clinician’s ability to identify subtle abnormalities. As hand therapy and hand surgery literature evolves, the WHAT test represents a progressive step in refining diagnostic approaches for De Quervain’s tenosynovitis, offering a test that may contribute to enhanced diagnostic accuracy and patient care.
In conclusion, understanding the nuances of Finkelstein’s, Eichhoff’s, and the WHAT is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective management of De Quervain’s tenosynovitis.
References:
Goubau, J. F., Goubau, L., Van Tongel, A., Van Hoonacker, P., Kerckhove, D., & Berghs, B. (2014). The wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb (WHAT) test: a more specific and sensitive test to diagnose de Quervain tenosynovitis than the Eichhoff’s Test. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume, 39(3), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193412475043
Wu, F., Rajpura, A., & Sandher, D. (2018). Finkelstein’s Test Is Superior to Eichhoff’s Test in the Investigation of de Quervain’s Disease. Journal of hand and microsurgery, 10(2), 116–118. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1626690
2 Comments
Leave a Comment
More To Read
3 Different Ways to Incorporate Weighted Balls into Hand Therapy Treatment Sessions:
By: Kelsey Melton 3 Different Ways to Incorporate Weighted Balls into Treatment Sessions: Weighted balls can be incorporated into hand therapy treatment sessions in various ways. This is a great therapeutic intervention for many limitations and is simple to grade up or down based on patient needs. Here are some exercise ideas to get you…
Read MoreWhich orthosis design is better for zone 5-6 extensor tendon injuries, a relative motion orthosis compared to a dynamic extension orthosis?
M. Buhler, ˝ D. Gwynne-Jones, M. Chin et al., (2023) Are the outcomes of relative motion extension orthoses noninferior and cost-effective compared with dynamic extension orthoses for management of zones V-VI finger extensor tendon repairs: A randomizedcontrolledtrialJournalofHandTherapy. The Skinny: The aim of this study was to compare the data for two different types of orthoses…
Read MoreAssessments Seen in the Hand Therapy World
By: Dalton Busch Below I have created a list of some of the common assessments that are seen in the hand therapy world. Keep in mind that this list is not inclusive of all the assessments you might come across in this setting. With each assessment, I describe what it is, who the assessment is…
Read MoreSign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!
Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.
Thank you! excellent and clear and with references too!
Thank you! We are happy to share.