Which orthosis design is better for zone 5-6 extensor tendon injuries, a relative motion orthosis compared to a dynamic extension orthosis?

M. Buhler, ˝ D. Gwynne-Jones, M. Chin et al., (2023) Are the outcomes of relative motion extension orthoses noninferior and cost-effective compared with dynamic extension orthoses for management of zones V-VI finger extensor tendon repairs: A  randomizedcontrolledtrialJournalofHandTherapy. 

extensor tendon

The Skinny:  The aim of this study was to compare the data for two different types of orthoses for treating a zone 5-6 extensor tendon injury.  Type one was a relative motion orthosis (RMO) plus, meaning the utilization of an RMO and a wrist support together.  The second time was a dynamic wrist hand finger orthosis.  Participant in both groups were fitted with a nighttime extension orthosis 

In the Weeds:  There were a total of 37 participants in the study with a mean age of 39 years old with an extensor tendon repair in zone five or six. The study design was a parallel group non-inferiority randomized controlled trial design.  Non-inferiority design is used when an alternate intervention is not any worse than the current established treatment.  

Outcome measures included primary and secondary outcomes. The primary outcome measure was the total active range of motion (TAM), and the secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, Quickdash and quality of life.  These were measured at 6 and 12 weeks post-operative.  Grip strength was only assessed at 12 weeks.  

extensor tendon

Image from article M. Bu ̋hler, D. Gwynne-Jones, M. Chin et al./Journal of Hand Therapy. Image A, B, and C depicts the dynamic orthosis group & image D, E, and F depicts the RMO plus group

Brining it Home:  

There were no statistical differences in total active range of motion, orthotic or outcome satisfaction.  Patient in the RMO plus group were more compliant in wearing the RMO plus compared to those wearing the dynamic orthosis. On average participants returned to work in both groups at 7 weeks post-operative.   During the study there were two tendon ruptures in the RMO plus orthosis group compared to one in the dynamic orthosis group.  

RMO plus management of extensor tendon injuries was determined to be non inferior to the dynamic orthosis group in terms of all outcome measures.  

Rating : 4/5

Limitations to this study include the small sample size as well as the fact that all study participants were males showing a lack of generalizability.   However even with the limitations of the study, it was shown that each patient group had equal findings and both types of orthotic designs are safe to use with zone 5 and 6 extensor tendons.  

Leave a Comment

More To Read

Hand Therapy: Does Dry Needling work to Treat Trigger Finger

June 21, 2020

By: Taylor Volentine Reference:  Azizian, M., Bagheri, H., Olyaei, G., Shadmeher, A., Okhovatpour, M. A., Dehghan, P., Jalaei, S., Sarafraz, H. (2019). Effects of dry needling on tendon-pulley architecture, pain and hand function in patients with trigger finger: a randomized controlled trial study. The Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 31. 295-298. doi:10.1589/jpts.31.295 Photo retrieved from…

Read More

Scar Wars: Scar Management Techniques

May 27, 2019

We will briefly discuss Scar Management Options and Techniques

Read More

Volkmann’s Contracture

December 13, 2020

Written by Melissa Miller Introduction Volkmann’s contracture is a rare condition that occurs after injury to the elbow and upper arm, typically from a crush injury. This condition can occur when acute compartment syndrome is left untreated. If unrecognized, Volkmann’s contracture can lead to a permanent deformity in the hand and forearm. Hand therapists are…

Read More

Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!

Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.