M. Buhler, ˝ D. Gwynne-Jones, M. Chin et al., (2023) Are the outcomes of relative motion extension orthoses noninferior and cost-effective compared with dynamic extension orthoses for management of zones V-VI finger extensor tendon repairs: A randomizedcontrolledtrialJournalofHandTherapy.
The Skinny: The aim of this study was to compare the data for two different types of orthoses for treating a zone 5-6 extensor tendon injury. Type one was a relative motion orthosis (RMO) plus, meaning the utilization of an RMO and a wrist support together. The second time was a dynamic wrist hand finger orthosis. Participant in both groups were fitted with a nighttime extension orthosis
In the Weeds: There were a total of 37 participants in the study with a mean age of 39 years old with an extensor tendon repair in zone five or six. The study design was a parallel group non-inferiority randomized controlled trial design. Non-inferiority design is used when an alternate intervention is not any worse than the current established treatment.
Outcome measures included primary and secondary outcomes. The primary outcome measure was the total active range of motion (TAM), and the secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, Quickdash and quality of life. These were measured at 6 and 12 weeks post-operative. Grip strength was only assessed at 12 weeks.
Image from article M. Bu ̋hler, D. Gwynne-Jones, M. Chin et al./Journal of Hand Therapy. Image A, B, and C depicts the dynamic orthosis group & image D, E, and F depicts the RMO plus group
Brining it Home:
There were no statistical differences in total active range of motion, orthotic or outcome satisfaction. Patient in the RMO plus group were more compliant in wearing the RMO plus compared to those wearing the dynamic orthosis. On average participants returned to work in both groups at 7 weeks post-operative. During the study there were two tendon ruptures in the RMO plus orthosis group compared to one in the dynamic orthosis group.
RMO plus management of extensor tendon injuries was determined to be non inferior to the dynamic orthosis group in terms of all outcome measures.
Rating : 4/5
Limitations to this study include the small sample size as well as the fact that all study participants were males showing a lack of generalizability. However even with the limitations of the study, it was shown that each patient group had equal findings and both types of orthotic designs are safe to use with zone 5 and 6 extensor tendons.
More To Read
By: Chelsea Gonzalez Why do pediatric clients often not require as much hand therapy for soft tissue injuries when compared to adults? The simple answer: Kids have very elastic soft tissue, which can return to its original shape and position after stretch. This elasticity is lost with time as collagen fibers expand and their internal…Read More
Splinting versus Stretching to improve hand function and reduce hand spasticity after stroke Reference: Ahmad Khan, M., & Singh, P. (2018, February). Effect of Hand Splinting versus Stretching Exercises for Reducing Spasticity and Improving Hand Function in Poststroke Hemiplegia: AComparative Interventional Study. Retrieved December 4, 2022, fromhttps://www.ijotonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0445 -7706;year=2018;volume=50;issue=4;spage=125;epage=129;aulast=Khan The Skinny: A comparative study by Khan…Read More
We are always looking for ways of the intrinsic hand strengthening. It is easy to overlook the importance of these small but mighty muscles. They are essential to performing functional grasps patterns. They can become weak in a short period of time due to their small size. So, How does intrinsic strengthening work?! The Basics…Read More
Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!
Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.