Carpal Tunnel Release: Outcomes of Pediatric and Adolescent
Filed under Diagnoses
Rapid Review. Outcomes of pediatric and adolescent carpal tunnel release based on etiology.
Velicki, K., Goldfarb, C. A., Roberts, S., & Wall, L. B. (2021). Outcomes of pediatric and adolescent carpal tunnel release. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 46(3), 178-186.
The Skinny: Less than 1% of pediatric carpal tunnel is idiopathic in nature, compared to adults where the majority of carpal tunnel is idiopathic. Limited studies have looked into the surgical outcomes of pediatric carpal tunnel release and there have been no studies comparing outcomes based on the etiology of symptoms.
In the Weeds: Twenty-three patients with 26 surgeries were enrolled in the study and grouped based on the etiology: All of these patients had hand median nerve pain or other symptoms such as numbness and tingling indicating carpal tunnel syndrome.
| Etiology | Number of Hands |
| Lysosomal storage disease | 11 hands |
| Idiopathic | 6 hands |
| Acute traumatic | 7 hands |
| Delayed traumatic | 5 hands |
| Tumorous | 2 hands |
Outcome measures included the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores.
Bringing it Home: The median age for surgery was 12.7 years (range 2.5 – 23.3). All patients with tumorous etiology and acute trauma had resolution of symptoms. Those with delayed and idiopathic etiology experienced recurrent symptoms. Patients with lysosomal storage disease all experienced the gradual return of their symptoms with 2 of the patients undergoing revision carpal tunnel release.
In acute cases, carpal tunnel release was very successful in relieving median nerve pain in the pediatric population, but not always in the delayed traumatic. Approximately 50% with idiopathic carpal tunnel experienced resolution of symptoms. With lysosomal storage disease, the patient experienced relief for a few years.
Rating ⅘
There were multiple limitations in the study including a limited number of participants in each category. There was also some diagnostic uncertainty, as some of the diagnosis was based on the clinician’s judgment. Lastly, phone interviews and chart reviews were utilized to obtain outcomes data, so there were various means utilized to obtain the data, in which the interviewer could have influenced the outcomes.
More To Read
Scar Wars: Scar Management Techniques
We will briefly discuss Scar Management Options and Techniques
Read More
When should you use a Static Progressive Splint in Hand Therapy?
Flowers, K. (2002). A proposed decision hierarchy for splinting the stiff joint, with an emphasis on force application parameters. Journal of Hand Therapy, 15, 158–162. The Skinny- The article proposes a decision hierarchy to determine when you should apply a static progressive or dynamic orthosis. The decision hierarchy uses a modified Weeks test (MWT). The…
Read More
Hand Therapy as a New Grad or Student
Tips for Getting Prepared for hand therapy as a new grad or a Level II Fieldwork Everything you need to know in hand therapy starts with the upper extremity anatomy. Here is a quick checklist to review and hopefully help get you started in your new hand therapy setting. By: Tristany Hightower I suggest, as…
Read More
Our Favorite Mallet Finger Splints
By: Josh MacDonald Fabricating a custom splint for a mallet finger injury is challenging. Fingers are tiny and they have small tolerances for errors and adjustments with custom splints. Making a splint for a mallet finger injury is probably the hardest type of finger splint for a therapist to make. Treatment recommendations vary, with some…
Read More
Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!
Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.