Sensory return after a hand injury specifically a peripheral nerve injury
After a peripheral nerve injury, there are often times impairments in sensory function and/or motor function. The rate of recovery varies based on the degree of injury, the overall health of the patient, and the patient’s age.
After an injury, it is important to be able to accurately assess the motor and sensory function. This can give insight into the severity of the injury and also give therapists a better idea of recovery. If there is motor involvement performing manual muscle testing is key. With sensory impairments, it is important to know the order of sensory return. Hence the reason for this paper.
Order of Sensory Recovery
3.) Vibration 30 Hz
4.) Moving Touch
5.) Constant Touch
6.) Vibration 256 Hz
7.) Touch Localization
8.) Two-Point Touch
1.) Pain is the first to return. This is our body’s way of letting us know when something is not right. When we sense pain we often modify what task is being performed or rest to avoid further injury. Pain is perceived through the nociceptor of the sensory system.
Pain can be tested clinically using a sharp/dull assessment. This assessment can be performed using a neurological pin, a safety pin, or a paper clip unfolded. You will take the chosen instrument and use the sharp and dull edge to press it on the patient’s skin. They will report if they are feeling sharp vs dull pain. It is important to not apply these stimuli too close together to avoid the summation of sensory responses.
2.) Temperature is second to return. This is how we determine if an object is too hot or cold to touch. Being able to detect hot vs cold is important in preventing burns. If a patient is unable to detect hot or cold, it is important to provide education on preventing injuries.
Testing for hot and cold after a peripheral nerve injury involves the utilization of test tubes. One tube is filled with hot water (40-45 degrees Celsius) and the other with cold water (5 to 15 degrees Celsius). The patient is asked to verbalize if they feel hot vs cold after each stimulus application.
3.) Vibration 30 Hz. It is very difficult to assess 30 Hz of vibration as it is a low-frequency vibration. This level of vibration is detected with the Meissner’s Corpuscles. You can use a tuning fork to determine if they feel the vibration. A tuning fork is around 128 Hz. Not exactly an accurate measurement.
4.) Moving touch can be tested by using a cotton ball and gently stroking along the test area. The patient is asked to identify when they feel the stimulus. Moving touch is easier to detect than constant touch and touch localization.
5.) Constant touch can be tested by using the tip of your finger and applying pressure. The patient is asked to identify when they feel the stimuli. Keep in mind finding the location at this point is not needed.
6.) Vibration 256 Hz. This is a much higher frequency vibration and the Pacinian Corpuscles are the sensory receptors used to identify this stimulus. Similar to the 30 Hz there are no accurate stimuli to test Vibration of 256 Hz.
7.) Touch Localization. Touch localization is next to return. This is tested by applying light touch and asking the patient to identify the location of the touch.
8.) Two-Point Touch. This is the ability of an individual to perceive two points of pressure when applied to the skin at the same time. Typically a circular two-point discriminator is used to test the skin. Initially, the tips are spread apart and the distance between the two tips gets smaller until only one point is perceived.
9.) Stereognosis. This is the ability to determine what an object is through touch. Limitations in stereognosis can be found after a peripheral nerve injury. It is typically the last to return. To test stereognosis have the patient’s vision occluded and ask them to identify common objects. Examples of common objects include a key, bolt, coins, and/or a paper clip.
More To Read
Wound Healing Complications in Diabetic Patients who have undergone a Carpal Tunnel or Trigger Finger Release
By: Amalia Garcia Gundlach, B. K., Robbins, C. B., Lawton, J. N., & Lien, J. R. (2021). Wound Healing Complications in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel and Trigger Finger Releases: A Retrospective Cohort Study. The Journal of Hand Surgery, S0363502321003014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.05.009 The Skinny – carpal tunnel and diabetes In general, individuals with diabetes are more…Read More
Tan, A. C., Lam, K. S., & Lee, E. H. (2002). The Treatment Outcome of Trigger Thumb in Children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B, 11(3), 256-259. The Skinny:Pediatric trigger thumb is a “relatively uncommon” condition of unknown origins. Studies have indicated that spontaneous recovery of trigger thumb is around 25-40%, and chances increase with age.…Read More
Hand therapists may feel they are in a constant battle with scar tissue. It can limit ROM, cause pain, impede other structures, and leave a less than desirable appearance. Scar tissue starts forming as early as 2 weeks after an injury and can continue forming for up to 2 years. The earlier action is taken…Read More
Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!
Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.